Connect with us


ZARA’s Latest Ad Campaign Comes Under Fire: Genocide Marketing of Gaza
#BoycottZara started trending on social media after the Spanish retailer launched its 'The Jacket' campaign, which appears to have been inspired by the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.



Zara, the Spanish clothing giant, has found itself entangled in a fiery controversy following the launch of its latest advertising campaign titled “The Jacket.” The campaign, intended to showcase the versatility of a leather jacket, has instead sparked widespread outrage due to its unsettling imagery and insensitivity.

It features a series of photographs shot in an abandoned building. The stark backdrop is filled with rubble and debris, with mannequins dressed in Zara clothing posed amidst the destruction. One image, in particular, has drawn significant criticism. It depicts supermodel Kristen McMenamy, wearing a military-style jacket with the slogan “I really don’t care, do u?” while standing next to a mannequin wrapped in plastic, resembling a body bag.

Following the launch of this campaign, many social media pointed out the bizarre resemblance between the campaign’s images and that of the aftermath of the conflict in Gaza. Many users also said the mannequins wrapped in white shrouds are similar to those used to cover dead bodies in Gaza.

Glorification of human suffering and the obliviousness to conflict

With the world grappling with urgent calls for a ceasefire and global strikes, Zara’s decision to push a product-centric campaign seemed oblivious to the prevailing global sentiment. Many argue that a more principled approach to their marketing strategy would have demonstrated a brand in touch with the world’s challenges, promoting a more positive public image. Critics argue that the timing of the campaign launch is what heavily fueled the backlash.

Not a first of its case: Obsession with insensitivity

Controversies have been integral to big brands and this one is another addition to a growing list of resentments against Zara. Critics point to the company’s history of racial profiling incidents in their stores, where customers of colour have been unfairly targeted and harassed. Additionally, accusations of Zara’s alleged support for Israeli extremism have surfaced in recent years, which has fueled the fire of discontent among Palestinian supporters.

Many argue that “The Jacket” campaign is not an isolated incident but rather a continuation of Zara’s pattern of insensitivity and disregard for ethical considerations. The campaign is being seen as a disregard for the suffering of the Palestinian people and utilizing their plight for commercial profits.

The opportunity in crisis: Aapda mei avsar

Big brands often resort to cold-shock advertising, pushing boundaries in an attempt to stand out in the crowded market. In their pursuit of attention, some brands overlook the impact of their marketing choices. In their quest for market dominance, they forget decency to capture the audience’s attention. The desire to create buzz and stand out leads brands to make controversial choices, sacrificing sensitivity for the sake of visibility.

A call for responsibility

The “The Jacket” controversy is a stark reminder for brands that they need to be mindful of their advertising approach. Brands must be aware of the social and political environment before launching campaigns and they must be prepared to face the consequences if they fail to do so. As the future generation is becoming aware, the future of brands like Zara lies in their ability to navigate the complexities of the modern world with sensitivity and responsibility.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments


Editor's Pick

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x